Introduction to Fracking, The US experience.

 Since the end of the 20th century, horizontal drilling has been combined with high-volume hydraulic fracturing as novel technologies for extracting dispersed oil and natural gas, primarily from shale bedrock, that would otherwise not flow to the surface. Typically, these unconventional extraction methods (collectively known as “fracking”) take place on clustered multi-well pads where individual well bores extend vertically down into the shale formation and then turn horizontally, tunneling through the shale in various directions. These lateral tunnels can extend a mile or more underground.

To liberate the gas (methane) or oil trapped inside the shale, many small explosive charges followed by high volumes of pressurized fluid are sent into the shale layer to expand and extend its many naturally occurring cracks, bedding planes, and faults. Silica sand grains (or sometimes ceramic beads) are carried by the pressurized fluid into these spaces and remain there after the pressure is released, acting to prop open these now-widened fissures in the shale and allowing the methane or oil trapped within to flow up the well.

Fracking fluid consists of fresh water to which is added a sequence of chemicals that include biocides, friction-reducers, gelling agents, anti-scaling, and anti-corrosion agents. Some of the water used to frack wells remains trapped within the fractured zone and, as such, is permanently removed from the hydrologic cycle. The remainder travels back up to the surface. This flowback fluid contains not only the original chemical additives but also naturally occurring substances carried up from the shale zone, which often include brine, heavy metals, and radioactive elements.

Once in production, a fracked well continues to generate liquid throughout its lifetime. This produced water, which contains many of the same toxic substances as flowback fluid, is a second component of fracking waste, and it also requires containment and disposal. In addition, fracking waste includes solid drilling cuttings, which are typically laced with various chemical substances used to aid the drilling process. These cuttings, which can also contain radioactive elements, are typically disposed in landfills.

As fracking operations in the United States have increased in frequency, size, and intensity, and as the transport of extracted materials has expanded, a significant body of evidence has emerged to demonstrate that these activities are dangerous to people and their communities in ways that are difficult—and may prove impossible—to mitigate. Risks include adverse impacts on water, air, agriculture, public health and safety, property values, climate stability, and economic vitality, as well as earthquakes.

Researching these complex, large-scale industrialized activities—and the ancillary infrastructure that supports them—takes time and has been hindered by institutional secrecy. Nonetheless, research is gradually catching up to the last decade’s surge in fracking from shale. A growing body of peer-reviewed studies, accident reports, and investigative articles has detailed specific, quantifiable evidence of harm and has revealed fundamental problems with the entire life cycle of operations associated with unconventional drilling, fracking, and fracked-gas infrastructure. Industry studies, as well as independent analyses, indicate inherent engineering problems

 

including uncontrolled and unpredictable fracturing, induced seismicity, extensive methane leakage, and well casing and cement failures that cannot be prevented with currently available materials and technologies.

Fracking-related problems also originate from sources independent of engineering. These include habitat destruction; inadequate solutions for wastewater disposal; the presence of abandoned wells or vertical fault lines that can serve as pathways for fluid migration into aquifers; and standard operational industry norms (venting, flaring, blowdowns) that contribute to methane releases and air pollution.

Earlier scientific predictions and anecdotal evidence are now bolstered by extensive empirical data, confirming that the public health risks from unconventional gas and oil extraction are real, the range of adverse environmental impacts wide, and the negative economic consequences considerable. Our examination of the peer-reviewed medical and public health literature uncovered no evidence that fracking can be practiced in a manner that does not threaten human health.

Despite this emerging body of knowledge, industry secrecy, and government actions and inaction continue to thwart scientific inquiry, leaving many potential problems—especially cumulative, long-term risks—unidentified, unmonitored, and largely unexplored. This problem is compounded by non-disclosure agreements, sealed court records, and legal settlements that prevent families and their doctors from discussing injuries and illness. As a result, no quantitative and comprehensive inventory of human hazards yet exists.

The long-entrenched problem of secrecy shows no sign of resolving. The identity of chemicals used in fracking fluids remains proprietary and lies beyond the reach of federal right-to-know legislation that governs other industries. The nation’s largest public database on chemicals used in fracking operations, FracFocus, operates on a voluntary basis, and, while 23 states have adopted it to serve as a de facto chemical disclosure registry, its data has, over time, become increasingly less, rather than more, comprehensive and transparent. As documented in a 2016 study by a Harvard University team, rates of withheld information and claims of trade secrecy have increased since FracFocus was first launched in 2011.

The incomplete picture created by lack of transparency not withstanding, the evidence to date indicates that fracking operations pose severe threats to health, both from water contamination and from air pollution. In the United States, more than two billion gallons of water and fracking fluids are injected daily under high pressure into the earth for the purpose of enabling oil and gas extraction via fracking or, after the fracking is finished, to flush the extracted wastewater down any of the 187,570 disposal wells across the country that accept oil and gas waste. All of that two billion daily gallons of fluid is toxic, and it passes through our nation’s groundwater aquifers on its way to the deep geological strata below where it demonstrably raises the risk for earthquakes. In the air around drilling and fracking operations and their attendant infrastructure, researchers have measured strikingly high levels of toxic pollutants, including the potent carcinogen benzene and the chemical precursors of ground-level ozone (smog). In some cases, concentrations of fracking-related air pollutants in communities where people live and work exceed federal safety standards. Research shows that air emissions from fracking can drift and pollute the air hundreds of miles downwind.

 

About one-third of the natural gas inventory in the United States is used to generate electricity, and, enabled by fracking, natural gas has, as of 2016, exceeded coal as the nation’s leading source of electricity. With hydraulically fractured wells now producing more than two-thirds of U.S. natural gas and half of U.S. crude oil, fracking’s “unconventional” techniques can no longer be considered atypical nor can the question of their public health risks be considered inconsequential.

Drilling and fracking operations and their ancillary infrastructure have profoundly altered Earth’s landscape. The flare stacks and artificial lights from major shale plays are visible from space, as is the upward buckling of Earth’s surface that is caused by the high-pressure injection of fracking waste water into disposal wells.

The dramatic increase in fracking over the last decade in the United States has pushed oil and gas extraction operations into heavily populated areas. At least six percent of the population—17.6 million Americans—now live within a mile of an active oil or gas well, a number that includes 1.4 million young children and 1.1 million elderly people. About 8.6 million people are served by a drinking water source that is located within a mile from an unconventional well. Understanding the potential for exposure and accompanying adverse impacts is a public health necessity.